home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.eunet.fi!fipnet!kone!jsaarinen
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- X-NewsReader: IntuiNews 1.2b (31.7.94)
- References: <38231776@kone.fipnet.fi> <judas.0gzs@tomtec.abg.sub.org>
- From: "Jyrki Saarinen" <jsaarinen@kone.fipnet.fi>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 96 16:45:13 UT
- Comments: Illegal date header - new date added by quicknews
- X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Jan 96 17:14:14
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
- Distribution: world
- Subject: Re: >>>>>>> The Future: Amiga goes PC (...aeh: "PowerMsPenti...?) <<<<<
- Message-ID: <38231794@kone.fipnet.fi>
-
-
- > >Yeah right. Akiko is not faster compared to modern c2p algorithms.
- >
- > Sorry, but this is completely wrong. On a 040, I need 2 moves into the
- > akiko and 2 moves from akiko to chipmem. This way I get less than 5%
- >áCPU time loss due to C2P on a 040 . Doing the same job means 50%
- >áCPU-usage using a C2P-code from aminet, and still 30% using my own code.
-
- What? 040 does c2p free, while copying from fast2chip. Akiko
- should be as fast.
-
- -- _
- a Stellar programmer _ //
- "Amiga - back for the future" \X/
-